Premium
Iliac Crest Autogenous Bone Graft versus Alloplastic Graft and Guided Bone Regeneration in the Reconstruction of Atrophic Maxillae: A 5‐Year Retrospective Study on Cost‐Effectiveness and Clinical Outcome
Author(s) -
Dahlin Christer,
Johansson Anita
Publication year - 2011
Publication title -
clinical implant dentistry and related research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.338
H-Index - 85
eISSN - 1708-8208
pISSN - 1523-0899
DOI - 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2009.00221.x
Subject(s) - iliac crest , medicine , maxilla , dentistry , implant , retrospective cohort study , bone grafting , surgery
Background: Reconstruction of the atrophic maxillae with autogenous bone graft and jawbone‐anchored bridges is a well‐proven technique. However, the morbidity associated with the concept should not be neglected. Furthermore, the costs for such treatment, including general anesthesia and hospital stay, are significant. Little data are found in the literature with regard to a cost‐benefit approach to various treatment alternates. Purpose: The aim of this retrospective study was to compare from a health‐economical and clinical perspective the reconstruction of the atrophic maxillae prior to oral implant treatment either with autogenous bone grafts harvested from the iliac crest or the use of demineralized freeze‐dried bone (DFDB) in combination with a thermoplastic carrier (Regeneration Technologies Inc., Alachua, FL, USA) and guided bone regeneration (GBR). Materials and Methods: A total of 26 patients (13 + 13) were selected and matched with regard to indication, sex, and age. The study was performed 5 years after the completion of the treatment. Implant survival, morbidity, and complications were analyzed. Furthermore, a detailed analysis of the total cost for the respective treatment modality was performed, including material, costs for staff, sick leave, etc. Results: The study revealed no statistical difference with regard to implant survival for the respective groups. The average total cost, per patient, for the DFDB group was 22.5% of the total cost for a patient treated with autogenous bone grafting procedures. Conclusions: The study concluded that reconstruction of atrophic maxillae with a bone substitute material (DFDB) in combination with GBR can be performed with an equal treatment outcome and with less resources and a significant reduced cost in selected cases compared with autogenous bone grafts from the iliac crest.