Premium
Implant Treatment in Combination with Lateral Augmentation of the Alveolar Process: A 3‐Year Prospective Study
Author(s) -
Hellem Solve,
Åstrand Per,
Stenström Birgitta,
Engquist Bo,
Bengtsson Martin,
Dahlgren Simon
Publication year - 2003
Publication title -
clinical implant dentistry and related research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.338
H-Index - 85
eISSN - 1708-8208
pISSN - 1523-0899
DOI - 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2003.tb00206.x
Subject(s) - medicine , dentistry , implant , alveolar process , process (computing) , prospective cohort study , surgery , computer science , operating system
Background : In patients in whom the height of the alveolar process is adequate but the crest is too narrow to host an implant, lateral augmentation is required. Such augmentations have mostly been performed using autogenous bone blocks secured to the buccal surface. An alternative to autogenous bone may be bovine hydroxyapatite (Bio‐Oss, Geistlich Pharma AG, Wolhusen, Switzerland) or other bone substitutes. Purpose : The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical and radiographic outcome of dental implants inserted after lateral augmentation of too narrow alveolar processes with a combination of bovine hydroxyapatite (Bio‐Oss) and autogenous bone. Methods : Thirty patients (14 males and 16 females) with a mean age of 41.6 years fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Twenty‐nine augmentation sites with a total of 74 implants could be followed for 3 years. Results : Three implants were lost; these were lost before loading (at the abutment operation). The survival rate was 95.9%. The mean marginal bone loss during the 3‐year observation period was 0.3 ± 0.2 mm. Conclusions : A 50/50 combination of Bio‐Oss and autogenous bone chips stabilized with Tisseel (Baxter AG/Duo Quick AG, Vienna, Austria) was useful for lateral augmentation of the alveolar crest. Lateral grafts with Bio‐Oss, autogenous bone, and Tisseel made it possible to achieve good implant stability and high implant survival results. The bone level changes adjacent to the implants were the same as in nongrafted cases.