Premium
Influence of Demineralized Bone Matrix's Embryonic Origin on Bone Formation: An Experimental Study in Rats
Author(s) -
Stavropoulos Andreas,
Kostopoulos Lambros,
Mardas Nicolaos,
Karring Thorkild
Publication year - 2003
Publication title -
clinical implant dentistry and related research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.338
H-Index - 85
eISSN - 1708-8208
pISSN - 1523-0899
DOI - 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2003.tb00201.x
Subject(s) - demineralized bone matrix , dbm , endochondral ossification , bone formation , capsule , dentistry , matrix (chemical analysis) , anatomy , medicine , biomedical engineering , cartilage , chemistry , materials science , biology , composite material , amplifier , botany , optoelectronics , cmos
Background : There are results suggesting that differences regarding bone‐inducing potential, in terms of amount and/or rate of bone formation, exist between demineralized bone matrices (DBMs) of different embryonic origins. Purpose : The aim of the present study was to examine whether the embryonic origin of DBM affects bone formation when used as an adjunct to guided tissue regeneration (GTR). Materials and Methods : Endomembranous (EM) and endochondral (ECH) DBMs were produced from calvarial and long bones of rats, respectively. Prior to the study the osteoinductive properties of the DBMs were confirmed in six rats following intramuscular implantation. Following surgical exposure of the mandibular ramus, a rigid hemispheric Teflon capsule loosely packed with a standardized quantity of DBM was placed with its open part facing the lateral surface of the ramus in both sides of the jaw in 30 rats. In one side of the jaw, chosen at random, the capsule was filled with EM‐DBM, whereas in the other side ECH‐DBM was used. Groups of 10 animals were sacrificed after healing periods of 1, 2, and 4 months, and undecalcified sections of the capsules were produced and subjected to histologic analysis and computer‐assisted planimetric measurements. Results : During the experiment increasing amounts of newly formed bone were observed inside the capsules in both sides of the animals' jaws. Limited bone formation was observed in the 1‐ and 2‐month specimens, but after 4 months of healing, the newly formed bone in the ECH‐DBM grafted sides occupied 59.1% (range 45.6–74.7%) of the area created by the capsule versus 46.9% (range 23.0–64.0%) in the EM‐DBM grafted sides (p =.01). Conclusion : It is concluded that the embryonic origin of DBM influences bone formation by GTR and that ECH‐DBM is superior to EM‐DBM.