Premium
Comparison of two different PCR detection methods. Application to the diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis
Author(s) -
RODRIGUEZ J. C.,
FUENTES E.,
ROYO G.
Publication year - 1997
Publication title -
apmis
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.909
H-Index - 88
eISSN - 1600-0463
pISSN - 0903-4641
DOI - 10.1111/j.1699-0463.1997.tb05061.x
Subject(s) - tuberculosis , polymerase chain reaction , sputum , mycobacterium tuberculosis , nested polymerase chain reaction , medicine , agarose gel electrophoresis , amplicon , pulmonary tuberculosis , microbiology and biotechnology , virology , biology , pathology , dna , gene , genetics
The objectives are to assess the influence of the detection of the amplified DNA fragment on the sensitivity and specificity of the polymerase chain reaction (PCR). One hundred seventy‐five sputum samples from 123 patients were processed. Sixty samples were taken from 60 subjects without tuberculosis, and the rest were taken from subjects with tuberculosis confirmed by culture. A fragment of the IS6110 sequence of Mycobacterium tuberculosis , which was detected using two different methods, was amplified. The detection methods used were a digoxigenin‐labeled specific probe and chemiluminescent development and reamplification (nested PCR) combined with agarose gel electrophoresis. Sensitivity with probe detection was 75.65% and specificity 100%. Using the nested PCR technique, sensitivity rose to 93.04%, but specificity decreased to 96.6%. PCR is a quick and adequate way to diagnose pulmonary tuberculosis in cases where staining is negative yet there is a clinical suspicion of tuberculosis, even though a standardization process and large scale evaluation are still needed to determine its true usefulness.