Premium
Comparison between Bactec Nr. 660® and a conventional 12‐tube blood culture system
Author(s) -
Nir M.,
Prag J.,
Jensen J.,
Arpi M.
Publication year - 1990
Publication title -
apmis
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.909
H-Index - 88
eISSN - 1600-0463
pISSN - 0903-4641
DOI - 10.1111/j.1699-0463.1990.tb04982.x
Subject(s) - staphylococcus aureus , blood culture , microbiology and biotechnology , anaerobic exercise , escherichia coli , incubation , medicine , biology , bacteria , physiology , antibiotics , gene , biochemistry , genetics
The detection power of the automated blood culture system Bactec NR 660®, based on infrared detection of carbon dioxide in an agitated aerobic medium and a non‐agitated anaerobic medium, was compared with that of our conventional 12‐tube blood culture system. Of 1685 paired blood cultures, 258 (15.3%) were positive in one or both systems. Clinically relevant isolates were found in 11.5%. The dominating species were Escherichia coli (41%), followed by Staphylococcus aureus (14%) and Klebsiella spp. (8%). The Bactec® system detected 178 (10.6%) and the 12‐tube system 157 (9.3%) clinically relevant microorganisms after seven days' incubation. Significantly more clinically relevant isolates were detected by the Bactec® system alone as compared with the conventional system alone (40 versus 19, p < 0.01). The detection time was significantly shorter in the Bactec® system for all isolates and for E. coli and S. aureus separately (p < 0.01). 1.8% of the isolates in the Bactec® system and 2.1% in the 12‐tube system were considered clinically non‐relevant contaminants.