z-logo
Premium
EVALUATION OF RAPID METHODS FOR THE DETECTION OF BACTERIURIA (SCREENING) IN PRIMARY HEALTH CARE
Author(s) -
Hallander HANS O.,
Kallner ANDERS,
Lundin ARNE,
ÖSterberg EVA
Publication year - 1986
Publication title -
acta pathologica microbiologica scandinavica series b: microbiology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.909
H-Index - 88
eISSN - 1600-0463
pISSN - 0108-0180
DOI - 10.1111/j.1699-0463.1986.tb03018.x
Subject(s) - nitrite , primary care , diagnostic test , leukocyte esterase , bacteriuria , medicine , screening test , diagnostic accuracy , urine , dipstick , chemistry , veterinary medicine , pediatrics , family medicine , nitrate , organic chemistry
The diagnostic performance of six methods for bacteriuria testing has been studied in 781 urine specimens obtained in primary health care, using conventional culture as reference method. The cut‐off limits for classification of test results into positive and negative have been optimized with respect to diagnostic performance in primary health care. With optimized tests the following diagnostic efficiencies were obtained: 1) Bacterial ATP, 0.94; 2) Bacterial count in sediment, 0.93; 3) Nitrite test, 0,92; 4) Dipslide test, 0,92; 5) White cell count in sediment; 0,87; 6) Granulocyte esterase test; 0.83. The diagnostic performance was also studied for all combinations of two tests. The highest diagnostic efficiency (0.96) was obtained by combining the ATP and dipslide tests. High diagnostic efficiencies can be obtained by a rapid primary test, using other tests for follow‐up testing of specimens with intermediate or uninterpretable primary results. The most promising results were obtained by using ATP as the primary test, with follow‐up testing of specimens with 3–25 nmol/l of ATP (12 per cent of the specimens). Follow‐up testing by conventional culture resulted in overall diagnostic efficiency of 0.98. By performing the nitrite test on specimens with intermediary ATP‐results, 81 per cent of the patients with UTI can be classified without culture. Only patients with intermediary ATP and negative nitrite results (10 per cent of the total number) will have to wait for final diagnosis based on conventional culture. Some alternative strategies to combine available methods are discussed in detail. Major advantages of the ATP test are that the test can be performed while the patients are waiting; it provides a numerical and objective result, and, in contrast to culture, it is not influenced by adhesion of bacteria to somatic cells.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here