Premium
Management alters interspecific leaf trait relationships and trait‐based species rankings in permanent meadows
Author(s) -
Rose Laura,
Rubarth Marie C.,
Hertel Dietrich,
Leuschner Christoph
Publication year - 2013
Publication title -
journal of vegetation science
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.1
H-Index - 115
eISSN - 1654-1103
pISSN - 1100-9233
DOI - 10.1111/j.1654-1103.2012.01455.x
Subject(s) - trait , specific leaf area , biology , interspecific competition , grassland , ecology , human fertilization , ecosystem , growing season , biodiversity , agronomy , botany , photosynthesis , computer science , programming language
Question Plant functional traits have the potential to characterize species ecological strategies and predict ecosystem responses to environmental changes. (1) Do trait responses to land‐use intensification alter trait‐based species rankings, and (2) does land‐use intensification alter relationships among interrelated leaf traits? Location Solling M ountains, C entral G ermany ( G rassland management experiment, G rass M an). Methods Over the course of 2 yr with differing weather conditions, we analysed the specific leaf area ( SLA ) of eight grassland species and related it to leaf nitrogen per mass ( N mass ) or area ( N area ) in an old‐growth grassland with two fertilization levels (none vs NPK fertilization, 180‐30‐100 kg·ha −1 ·yr −1 ) and two cutting frequencies (one vs three cuts per season). Results NPK fertilization led to an expected increase in SLA , N mass and N area , while the effect of altered cutting frequency on leaf traits was more species‐specific. Species‐specific responses to management significantly altered trait‐based species rankings. A significant SLA – N mass relationship occurred in unfertilized plots, whereas the SLA – N area relationship was stronger in fertilized plots. This was mostly caused by a decrease in the among‐species variation in N mass upon fertilization. Conclusions Although our results reflect only short‐term community responses, they indicate that trait‐based species ranking and the relationships between plant functional traits are not always consistent across different management regimes. Hence, trait values used to characterize species and communities should never be discussed without consideration of the set of environmental conditions under which they were measured.