Premium
Using radioligand‐binding assays to measure tissue transglutaminase autoantibodies in young children
Author(s) -
Agardh D,
Carlsson A,
Lynch K,
Axelsson I,
Lernmark Å,
Ivarsson SA
Publication year - 2004
Publication title -
acta paediatrica
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.772
H-Index - 115
eISSN - 1651-2227
pISSN - 0803-5253
DOI - 10.1111/j.1651-2227.2004.tb02716.x
Subject(s) - tissue transglutaminase , medicine , antibody , autoantibody , coeliac disease , immunoglobulin a , immunology , intraepithelial lymphocyte , biopsy , endomysium , immunopathology , immunoglobulin g , gastroenterology , disease , biology , immune system , biochemistry , enzyme
Aim : To measure autoantibodies against tissue transglutaminase (tTG) in young children prospectively screened for coeliac disease (CD). Methods : In total, 652 children aged 2.9 (2.5–4.2) y were analysed for IgA‐tTG and IgG‐tTG with radioligand‐binding assays and IgA endomysial antibodies (EMA) by indirect immunofluorescence. Antibody‐positive children were retested after 1.2 (range 0.2–1.9) y. Intestinal biopsy was performed on children with persistently high antibody levels. Results : In total, 3.2% (95% CI: 1.9–4.6%) of the 652 children were positive for at least one antibody at baseline: 2.5% (95% CI: 1.3–3.7%) for IgA‐tTG, 1.7% (95% CI: 0.7–2.7%) for IgG‐tTG and 2.9% (95% CI: 1.6–4.2%) for IgA‐EMA, respectively. Ten children were positive for all three antibodies, five for both IgA‐tTG and EMA, four for EMA only, one for IgA‐tTG and another for IgG‐tTG. IgA‐EMA titres correlated with IgA‐tTG levels ( r = 0.73, p = 0.0003). At follow‐up, seven of 20 children remained positive for all three antibodies, three for IgA‐tTG only, one for both IgA‐tTG and EMA, one for IgA‐tTG and IgG‐tTG, and the remaining child refused further participation. Three biopsies showed villous atrophy, two increased intraepithelial lymphocytes and two normal findings. Biopsy was not performed in four children with low or declining tTG antibody levels at follow‐up and in one child who declined. CD was evident in 0.5% (95% CI: 0.0–1.0%) (3/652). Conclusion : This study revealed a high number of young children positive for tTG antibodies as well as EMA, but the majority showed declining levels in both antibodies over time. We suggest using radioligand‐binding assays for quantitative measurement of tTG antibodies when change in antibody levels is studied in young children.