Premium
Infant hearing screening with an automated auditory brainstem response screener and the auditory brainstem response
Author(s) -
Chen SJ,
Yang EY,
Kwan ML,
Chang P,
Shiao AS,
Lien CF
Publication year - 1996
Publication title -
acta pædiatrica
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.772
H-Index - 115
eISSN - 1651-2227
pISSN - 0803-5253
DOI - 10.1111/j.1651-2227.1996.tb13883.x
Subject(s) - medicine , brainstem , auditory brainstem response , audiology , auditory pathways , hearing loss , psychiatry
From 1653 babies hospitalized in the Veterans General Hospital—Taipei from 1993 to 1995, 260 infants at risk of hearing impairment were selected. The risk criteria of hearing impairment for neonates were based on the recommendation of the US Joint Committee on Infant Hearing, 1990 Position Statement. All these infants were screened with the Algo‐1 Plus, an automated auditory brainstem response (ABR) screener at a mean postconceptional age of 40.7 ± 4.5 weeks. Thirty‐nine cases (39/260, 15%) involving 57 ears (57/520, 11%), failed the screening. Except for one infant who died, the babies had an ABR test for both air‐ and bone‐conducted stimuli and an otological examination. The case‐specific incidence of conductive hearing deficit at the initial ABR test was 5.4%. The prevalence of sensorineural hearing deficits was between 2.3% confirmed and 3.1% including infants who did not have follow‐up tests. The n‐value that indicated agreement between the Algo‐1 and ABR results was 0.64, and the overall efficiency of using Algo‐1 to correctly identify pass or failure of the ABR was 83%.