z-logo
Premium
PROLONGED INTERMITTENT POSITIVE PRESSURE VENTILATION BY NASAL PRONGS IN INTRACTABLE APNEA OF PREMATURITY
Author(s) -
MORETTI C.,
MARZETTI G.,
AGOSTINO R.,
PANERO A.,
PICECEBUCCI S.,
MENDICINI M.,
COLARIZI P.,
BUCCI G.
Publication year - 1981
Publication title -
acta pædiatrica
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.772
H-Index - 115
eISSN - 1651-2227
pISSN - 0803-5253
DOI - 10.1111/j.1651-2227.1981.tb05544.x
Subject(s) - medicine , intermittent positive pressure ventilation , apnea of prematurity , apnea , ventilation (architecture) , anesthesia , continuous positive airway pressure , positive pressure respiration , bronchopulmonary dysplasia , mechanical ventilation , pediatrics , obstructive sleep apnea , gestational age , pregnancy , mechanical engineering , biology , engineering , genetics
. Moretti, C, Marzetti, G., Agostino, R., Panero, A., Picece‐Bucci, S., Mendicini, M., Colarizi, P. and Bucci, G. (Institute of Pediatrics, Neonatal Division, University of Rome Medical School, Rome, Italy). Prolonged intermittent positive pressure ventilation (IPPV) by nasal prongs in intractable apnea of prematurity. Acta Paediatr Scand, 70:211, 1981. –In order to avoid endotracheal intubation in very small newborn infants requiring prolonged intermittent positive pressure ventilation (IPPV), a method was developed allowing delivery of IPPV by means of nasal prongs (nasal IPPV). A series of 10 newborn infants weighing 1200 g or less, and requiring nasal IPPV for 5 to 14 days because of intractable apnea has been reported. Five infants survived. With the exeption of hearing defects in two survivors, no lesions possibly due to the ventilation procedure were observed. Follow‐up examination showed severe mental and motor handicap in one infant, and apparently normal mental and motor development in 3 infants examined at the age of 12–27 months. It is suggested that nasal IPPV is an effective and safe method for prolonged ventilation of very small newborn infants with normal or not severely affected lungs, whereas it appears of very limited use in patients with stiff lungs, such as in severe HMD.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here