z-logo
Premium
Influence of ovariectomy and masticatory hypofunction on mandibular bone remodeling
Author(s) -
Patullo IMF,
Takayama L,
Patullo RF,
Jorgetti V,
Pereira RMR
Publication year - 2009
Publication title -
oral diseases
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.953
H-Index - 87
eISSN - 1601-0825
pISSN - 1354-523X
DOI - 10.1111/j.1601-0825.2009.01599.x
Subject(s) - medicine , bone mineral , masticatory force , condyle , ovariectomized rat , mandible (arthropod mouthpart) , femur , estrogen , soft tissue , endocrinology , bone density , osteoporosis , dentistry , anatomy , biology , surgery , botany , genus
  This study was designed to examine the effect of masticatory hypofunction and estrogen deficiency on mandible bone mass and compare this site with spine and femoral bone. Methods:  Twenty‐four rats were ovariectomized (OVX) or Sham‐operated (Sham) and analyzed after feeding with hard diet (Hard) or soft diet (Soft). They were divided into four groups: (GI)Sham‐Hard; (GII)OVX‐Hard; (GIII)Sham‐Soft and (GIV)OVX‐Soft. Bone mineral density (BMD) was measured in the spine and femur in the baseline and at the end of the study, and ΔBMD (final BMD − baseline BMD) was calculated. In mandible bone, BMD and histomorphometry were analyzed at the end of the experiment. Results:  Sham rats showed higher spine (GI: 13.5% vs GII: 0.74%, P  <   0.01; GIII: 10.67% vs GIV: −4.36%, P  <   0.001) and femur ΔBMD (GI: 14.43% vs GII: 4.42%, P  <   0.01; GIII: 10.58% vs GIV: 0.49%, P  <   0.001) than OVX, but no difference was observed in mandible BMD among these groups ( P  >   0.05). Soft‐diet groups showed decreased mandible BMD compared with hard‐diet groups (GIV vs GII, P  <   0.01; GIII vs GI, P  <   0.01). Similarly, mandibular condyle histomorphometry showed that soft‐diet groups presented a significant decrease in trabecular thickness and volume (GIV vs GII, P  <   0.05; GIII vs GI, P  <   0.01) compared with hard diet. Conclusion:  Our results suggest that mandibular bone loss resulted from decreased of mechanical loading during mastication, and was not affect by estrogen depletion.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here