Premium
Assessment of pulp blood flow in primary and permanent teeth using pulse oximetry
Author(s) -
Pozzobon Maria Helena,
de Sousa Vieira Ricardo,
Alves Ana Maria Hecke,
ReyesCarmona Jessie,
Teixeira Cleonice Silveira,
de Souza Beatriz Dulcinéia Mendes,
Felippe Wilson Tadeu
Publication year - 2011
Publication title -
dental traumatology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.82
H-Index - 81
eISSN - 1600-9657
pISSN - 1600-4469
DOI - 10.1111/j.1600-9657.2011.00976.x
Subject(s) - pulse oximetry , pulp (tooth) , dentistry , medicine , blood flow , anesthesia , cardiology
Abstract – Pulse oximetry (PO) is a well‐accepted non‐invasive method for assessing vascular health, based on oxygen saturation (SaO 2 ) measurements. The objectives of this study were to design and build a custom‐made PO dental sensor holder, to evaluate the effectiveness of PO in determining pulp blood flow in primary and permanent teeth, and to compare the SaO 2 levels obtained in teeth and on the little finger of patients. The PO sensor adapted to the custom‐made sensor holder is termed as a device to position and hold the PO sensor. This study evaluated SaO 2 readings obtained in the pulp of 123 teeth of 84 children aged 4–13 years. The teeth were divided into three groups: group I – primary teeth: 23 central incisors and 28 canines; group II – permanent teeth: 25 central incisors and 28 canines; and group III – endodontically treated teeth (control): 12 permanent central incisors and seven primary central incisors. The pulp blood flow and SaO 2 were measured and were compared with readings of the patient’s finger. Data were analyzed by paired t ‐tests and Pearson’s analysis method. The PO was able to identify all the clinically normal pulps contained in the sample, and all the endodontically treated teeth (controls) showed no response. The mean SaO 2 values were 85.27% in the teeth and 92.85% in the fingers. In conclusion, PO readings were effective in determining pulp blood flow in primary and permanent teeth. However, there was no correlation between the SaO 2 values in the fingers and in the teeth of the patients ( P < 0.05).