Premium
Mineral trioxide aggregate as a root canal filling material in reimplanted teeth. Microscopic analysis in monkeys
Author(s) -
Panzarini Sônia Regina,
Holland Roberto,
De Souza Valdir,
Poi Wilson Roberto,
Sonoda Celso Koogi,
Pedrini Denise
Publication year - 2007
Publication title -
dental traumatology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.82
H-Index - 81
eISSN - 1600-9657
pISSN - 1600-4469
DOI - 10.1111/j.1600-9657.2006.00456.x
Subject(s) - mineral trioxide aggregate , periodontal fiber , root canal , dentistry , cementum , calcium hydroxide , medicine , saline , molar , root canal filling materials , dental alveolus , tooth replantation , orthodontics , chemistry , dentin , pathology , resorption , root resorption
– This study analyzed mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) as a root canal filling material for the immediate reimplantation of monkey teeth. Four adult capuchin monkeys Cebus apella were used, which had their maxillary and mandibular lateral incisors on both sides extracted and reimplanted after 15 min. During the extra‐alveolar period, the teeth were kept in saline solution and after reimplantation retention was performed with a stainless steel wire and composite resin for 14 days. After 7 days, the reimplanted teeth were submitted to endodontic treatment with biomechanics up to file n. 30 and irrigation with a saturated solution of calcium hydroxide [Ca(OH) 2 ], and then divided into two study groups: group I – root canal filled with a Ca(OH) 2 paste, and group II – root canal filled with MTA. Radiographic follow up was performed at 30, 60 and 90 days postoperatively, and after 180 days the animals were killed and specimens were processed for histomorphological analysis. The results revealed that most specimens of both groups presented organized periodontal ligament with no inflammation. The resorptions observed were surface resorptions and were repaired by cementum. Both MTA and Ca(OH) 2 were good root canal filling materials for immediately reimplanted teeth, providing good repair and also allowing biological sealing of some lateral canals. There was no significant difference between the study groups ( α = 29.60%).