Premium
Adhesive bonding of fragmented anterior teeth
Author(s) -
Farik B.,
Munksgaard E. C.,
Kreiborg S.,
Andreasen J. O.
Publication year - 1998
Publication title -
dental traumatology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.82
H-Index - 81
eISSN - 1600-9657
pISSN - 1600-4469
DOI - 10.1111/j.1600-9657.1998.tb00823.x
Subject(s) - dentin , materials science , adhesive , bond strength , fracture (geology) , dentistry , composite material , orthodontics , medicine , layer (electronics)
— This in vitro study investigated the fracture strengths of fractured incisors after reattachment to the remaining tooth structure, using either Gluma dentin‐bonding agent together with 1 of 13 different experimental resins or 1 of the following dentin‐bonding agents: Gluma+ (experimental modification of Gluma), Panavia 21, ScotchBondl (SingleBond), All‐Bondz, Dentastic, Super‐Bond, Prime & Bond 2.1. No siwcant differences were found in the experiments with various experimental resins. The fracture strength of teeth rebonded with Gluma, All‐Bondz, Dentastic, SuperBond or Prime & Bond 2.1 showed mean fracture strengths in the range of 8.7–11.2 MPa, which were significantly different in all cases from that of intact teeth (16.3 MPa). Teeth bonded with Gluma+, Panavia 21 or ScotchBondl (SingleBond) showed mean fracture strengths of 15.5, 14.6, and 14.2 MPa, respectively. These fracture strengths were not significantly different from that of intact teeth.