z-logo
Premium
Factors affecting the wear of sonic files
Author(s) -
Lumley P. J.
Publication year - 1996
Publication title -
dental traumatology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.82
H-Index - 81
eISSN - 1600-9657
pISSN - 1600-4469
DOI - 10.1111/j.1600-9657.1996.tb00514.x
Subject(s) - factorial experiment , culling , mathematics , computer science , statistics , zoology , biology , herd
The aim of this study was to investigate (actors affecting; the wear and culling ability of sonic files. A model system was used and the following variables evaluated, file type; Heliosonic, Rispisonic or Shaper, load; 25. 50 or 100 grams and length of time in use; new, 30 or 60 seconds. A 3 3 full factorial analysis with two replications into the effect of the above variables on the culling ability of the Heliosonic, Rispisonic and Shaper files powered by the MM 1500 sonic instrument was performed. A new file size 25 (Heliosonic and Shaper) or No 3 (Rispisonic) was used for each cut together with water irrigation and the substrate used was 1 mm thick sections of bovine bone. All variables bad a significant effect on culling (ANOVA, p<0.001). However examination of the F values showed that the most significant variable was load, followed by file type, and time. The most significant interaction was between file type and load followed by lime and file type. The interaction between time and load was not significant (p>0.05). The Rispisonic file was most susceptible to wear during use especially at higher loads and the Heliosonic file cut least. It is suggested that the Shaper file is the better design of the three with respect to cutting ability and wear with use.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here