Premium
Short Waitlist Time Does Not Adversely Impact Outcome Following Liver Transplantation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Author(s) -
Chao S. D.,
Roberts J. P.,
Farr M.,
Yao F. Y.
Publication year - 2007
Publication title -
american journal of transplantation
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.89
H-Index - 188
eISSN - 1600-6143
pISSN - 1600-6135
DOI - 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2007.01800.x
Subject(s) - medicine , hepatocellular carcinoma , liver transplantation , proportional hazards model , cohort , transplantation , oncology , milan criteria , carcinoma , cohort study , overall survival , surgery
It has been suggested that patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) undergoing living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) have worse recurrence‐free survival compared to deceased donor liver transplantation (CLT), leading to the hypothesis that short waitlist time or fast‐tracking may include more aggressive tumors that would have been selected out by traditionally longer waitlist time. The primary aim of the present study was to evaluate the impact of waitlist time on HCC recurrence. The study cohort included 100 patients meeting T2 criteria by imaging before undergoing CLT (n = 90) or LDLT (n = 10). The 5‐year recurrence‐free probability was 89.9% for the entire cohort, and 91.9%, 90.5% and 86.6%, respectively, for waitlist time of 3 months or less, 3–6 months and > 6 months (p = 0.81). In the Cox proportional hazards model, waitlist time was also not a significant predictor of HCC recurrence. Tumor under‐staging was observed in 20.5% of patients with waitlist time 3 months or less and 23.0% for waitlist time > 3 months (p = 0.81). In conclusion, our results failed to show an association between waitlist time and outcome after CLT or LDLT for HCC, and provided evidence disputing a significant role of waitlist time in the selection against HCC with unfavorable tumor biology.