z-logo
Premium
Effect of Induction Therapy Protocols on Transplant Outcomes in Crossmatch Positive Renal Allograft Recipients Desensitized with IVIG
Author(s) -
Vo A. A.,
Toyoda M.,
Peng A.,
Bunnapradist S.,
Lukovsky M.,
Jordan S. C.
Publication year - 2006
Publication title -
american journal of transplantation
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.89
H-Index - 188
eISSN - 1600-6143
pISSN - 1600-6135
DOI - 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2006.01472.x
Subject(s) - thymoglobulin , medicine , incidence (geometry) , antibody , renal function , induction therapy , kidney transplantation , gastroenterology , urology , cumulative incidence , urinary system , renal transplant , kidney , transplantation , chemotherapy , immunology , physics , optics
Here we retrospectively examine the efficacy of two antibody induction regimens using Zenapax ® or Thymoglobulin ® in patients with positive complement‐dependent cytotoxicity crossmatches (CDC‐CMXs) desensitized with IVIG (intravenous immunoglobulin). Between January 1999 and March 2005, 97 patients with (+) CDC‐CMXs received kidney transplants (43 deceased donors/54 living donors). All patients received at least 2 g/kg IVIG (maximum four doses) until an acceptable CMX was obtained. Patients were divided into two groups: 1. IVIG + Zenapax ® (n = 58), 2. IVIG + Thymoglobulin ® (n = 39). A total of 94% of patients in Group 1 and 84% in G2 have at least 2 years of follow up. Patient and graft survival was 96%/84% in Group 1 and 100%/90% in Group 2, p = NS. The number and severity of AR episodes were similar (36% Group 1 vs. 31% Group 2, p = NS) as was the incidence of C4d (+) antibody‐mediated rejection (AMR) (Banff Grade II/III) (22% Group 1 vs. 21% Group 2). Mean serum creatinines (SCrs) at 24 months were similar (Group 1: 1.4 ± 0.7 vs. G2: 1.5 ± 0.7 mg/dL). Induction therapy with Zenapax ® or Thymoglobulin ® results in excellent patient, graft survival and graft function at 2 years. There was no increased risk of viral infections or malignancies with either agent. Neither agent was effective in reducing the incidence of AMR.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here