z-logo
Premium
Intrinsic risk factors for acute ankle injuries among male soccer players: a prospective cohort study
Author(s) -
Engebretsen A. H.,
Myklebust G.,
Holme I.,
Engebretsen L.,
Bahr R.
Publication year - 2010
Publication title -
scandinavian journal of medicine and science in sports
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.575
H-Index - 115
eISSN - 1600-0838
pISSN - 0905-7188
DOI - 10.1111/j.1600-0838.2009.00971.x
Subject(s) - medicine , ankle , physical therapy , confidence interval , odds ratio , prospective cohort study , univariate analysis , univariate , cohort study , poison control , cohort , multivariate analysis , multivariate statistics , surgery , emergency medicine , statistics , mathematics
This prospective cohort study was conducted to identify risk factors for acute ankle injuries among male soccer players. A total of 508 players representing 31 amateur teams were tested during the 2004 pre‐season through a questionnaire on previous injury and function score (foot and ankle outcome score; FAOS), functional tests (balance tests on the floor and a balance mat) and a clinical examination of the ankle. Generalized estimating equations were used in univariate analyses to identify candidate risk factors, and factors with a P ‐value <0.10 were then examined in a multivariate model. During the season, 56 acute ankle injuries, affecting 46 legs (43 players), were registered. Univariate analyses identified a history of previous acute ankle injuries [odds ratio (OR) per previous injury: 1.25, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.09–1.43] and the FAOS sub‐score “Pain” (OR for a 10‐point difference in score: 0.81, 95% CI 0.62–1.04) as candidate risk factors. In a multivariate analysis, only the number of previous acute ankle injuries proved to be a significant (adjusted OR per previous injury: 1.23; 95% CI 1.06–1.41, P =0.005) predictor of new injuries. Function scores, functional tests and clinical examination could not independently identify players at an increased risk in this study.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here