Premium
Effect of l ‐ N 6 ‐(1‐iminoethyl)‐lysine, an inducible nitric oxide synthase inhibitor, on murine immune response induced by Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans lipopolysaccharide
Author(s) -
Sosroseno W.,
Musa M.,
Ravichandran M.,
Fikri Ibrahim M.,
Bird P. S.,
Seymour G. J.
Publication year - 2007
Publication title -
journal of periodontal research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.31
H-Index - 83
eISSN - 1600-0765
pISSN - 0022-3484
DOI - 10.1111/j.1600-0765.2006.00925.x
Subject(s) - lipopolysaccharide , immune system , nitric oxide , nitric oxide synthase , actinobacillus , spleen , microbiology and biotechnology , immunology , antibody , chemistry , biology , medicine , endocrinology , periodontitis
Background and Objectives: Inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) activity is known to regulate the immune response. The present study was carried out to determine the effect of l ‐ N 6 ‐(1‐iminoethyl)‐lysine ( l ‐ nil ), an iNOS inhibitor, on the induction of immune response to Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans lipopolysaccharide in mice. Material and Methods: BALB/c mice were sham‐immunized (group I), immunized with A. actinomycetemcomitans lipopolysaccharide (group II) or treated with l ‐ nil and immunized with A. actinomycetemcomitans lipopolysaccharide (group III). All animals were then challenged with viable A. actinomycetemcomitans . The levels of serum nitric oxide (NO), specific immunoglobulin G (IgG) isotypes and both interferon‐γ and interleukin‐4, as well as spleen cell‐derived iNOS activity, before and after bacterial challenge, were assessed. The diameter of skin lesions was also determined. Serum and spleen cells from the above groups were adoptively transferred to the recipients that were then subsequently challenged with live bacteria. Results: Treatment with l ‐ nil suppressed serum NO and splenic iNOS activity, but enhanced serum‐specific IgG2a antibody and interferon‐γ levels. The lesions in l ‐ nil ‐treated mice healed much more rapidly. Transfer with serum and cells from l ‐ nil ‐treated and A. actinomycetemcomitans lipopolysaccharide‐immunized donors resulted in rapid healing of the lesions in the recipients. Conclusion: It is suggested that treatment with l ‐NIL in mice immunized with A. actinomycetemcomitans lipopolysaccharide may shift the immune response towards a protective T helper 1‐like immunity against A. actinomycetemcomitans ‐induced infection.