Premium
Cone beam computed tomography evaluations of marginal alveolar bone before and after orthodontic treatment combined with premolar extractions
Author(s) -
Lund Henrik,
Gröndahl Kerstin,
Gröndahl HansGöran
Publication year - 2012
Publication title -
european journal of oral sciences
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.802
H-Index - 93
eISSN - 1600-0722
pISSN - 0909-8836
DOI - 10.1111/j.1600-0722.2012.00964.x
Subject(s) - overjet , cone beam computed tomography , medicine , dentistry , mandible (arthropod mouthpart) , molar , cementoenamel junction , premolar , dental alveolus , orthodontics , maxilla , buccal administration , computed tomography , botany , biology , radiology , genus
Using cone beam computed tomography ( CBCT ) we investigated the distance between the cemento–enamel junction ( CEJ ) and the marginal bone crest ( MBC ) at buccal, lingual, mesial, and distal surfaces of incisors to first molars in adolescents before (baseline) and after extractive orthodontic treatment (study end point). Patients with Class I malocclusion, crowding and an overjet of ≤5 mm were examined with a CBCT unit using a 60 × 60‐mm field of view and a 0.125‐mm voxel size. Large differences in marginal bone height were found at baseline, particularly between tooth surfaces. There was a slight correlation between age and CEJ – MBC distance. From baseline to the study end point, large bone‐height changes among teeth and tooth surfaces could be seen. Lingual surfaces, followed by buccal surfaces, showed the largest changes. Eighty‐four per cent of lingual surfaces of mandibular central incisors exhibited a bone‐height decrease of >2 mm. The bone‐height decrease was larger at lingual surfaces in the mandible than in the maxilla, and larger in girls (mean = 1.8 mm) than in boys (mean = 1.5 mm). Fewer than 1% of proximal surfaces exhibited changes of >2 mm. It is unknown whether the changes in marginal bone height are transitory. A high‐quality CBCT technique may help to determine this by providing a deeper insight into the long‐term side effects of orthodontic treatment.