Premium
Determining the minimally important difference for the Oral Health Impact Profile‐20
Author(s) -
Allen P. Finbarr,
O’Sullivan Maeve,
Locker David
Publication year - 2009
Publication title -
european journal of oral sciences
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.802
H-Index - 93
eISSN - 1600-0722
pISSN - 0909-8836
DOI - 10.1111/j.1600-0722.2009.00610.x
Subject(s) - dentures , medicine , context (archaeology) , clinical trial , oral health , dentistry , intervention (counseling) , nursing , paleontology , pathology , biology
In the context of clinical trials, measurement of change is critical. The aim of this study was to determine the minimally important difference (MID) for the Oral Health Impact Profile‐20 (OHIP‐20) when used with partially dentate patients undergoing treatment that included the provision of removable partial dentures. In a prospective clinical trial, 51 consecutive patients were provided with removable partial dentures. In addition to demographic and dental status data, patients completed an OHIP‐20 prior to treatment. One month postoperatively, patients completed a post‐treatment OHIP‐20 and a global transition scale. Domains assessed in the global transition scale were appearance, ability to chew food, oral comfort, and speech. The MID for the OHIP‐20 was calculated using the anchor‐based approach. From the initial sample of 51 patients, 44 completed post‐treatment questionnaires and were included in the analysis. Change scores in the four transition domains indicated that new dentures had a positive impact in the majority of subjects, especially in perceived impact on chewing and appearance. The study provided a guideline as to what constitutes the MID for the OHIP‐20. This benchmark can be used when interpreting the impact of clinical intervention for replacing missing teeth and for power calculation in statistical analyses.