Premium
The effects of low level laser treatment on recovery of nerve conduction and motor function after compression injury in the rat sciatic nerve
Author(s) -
Khullar Shelley M.,
Brodin Pål,
Messelt Edward B.,
Haanæs Hans R.
Publication year - 1995
Publication title -
european journal of oral sciences
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.802
H-Index - 93
eISSN - 1600-0722
pISSN - 0909-8836
DOI - 10.1111/j.1600-0722.1995.tb00030.x
Subject(s) - sciatic nerve , medicine , common peroneal nerve , nerve injury , sciatic nerve injury , anesthesia , peripheral nerve injury , nerve conduction velocity , hindlimb , anatomy , compound muscle action potential , surgery , electrophysiology
An animal study is presented examining the effect of low level laser (LLL) treatment on nerve regeneration following axonotmesis. Twenty animals received a standardised injury to the right sciatic nerve using a time, load and length sequence (10 min, 150 N. 5 mm) known to cause extensive axonal degeneration of the rat sciatic nerve. The LLL treatment was administered using a hand‐held laser probe in light contact with the skin on the dorsal aspect of the hind leg overlying the site of the axonotmesis injury to the sciatic nerve. A group of 10 animals were treated with 6J of LLL (GaAlAs 830 nm) daily for a period of 28 d. Ten more animals were treated daily with a sham exposure setting and served as controls. Nerve function was assessed by a recognised method of walking tract print analysis; the “Sciatic Functional Index” (SFI), and nerve regeneration was assessed by recording the evoked compound action potentials (cAP) in the common peroneal nerve. At 21 d post‐injury, the laser‐treated group had a significantly lower median SFI than the sham laser‐treated group, indicating that the real laser treatment had improved functional recovery in the nerve. However, no differences were found between the evoked cAP parameters that were measured in the laser‐treated and sham laser‐treated groups. Histological examination reiterated the lack of difference between the two groups. Consequently, the effects of LLL on recovery must have occurred more peripherally to the point measured.