Premium
Comparative study of dentin adhesives
Author(s) -
HANSEN ERIK KEITH,
ASMUSSEN ERIK
Publication year - 1985
Publication title -
european journal of oral sciences
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.802
H-Index - 93
eISSN - 1600-0722
pISSN - 0909-8836
DOI - 10.1111/j.1600-0722.1985.tb01958.x
Subject(s) - dentin , enamel paint , materials science , adhesive , composite material , dentistry , bond strength , medicine , layer (electronics)
– The marginal adaptation of Silux after application of different dentin adhesives was investigated in dentin cavities prepared in extracted human teeth. The cavity diameter ranged from 1.8 to 6.4 mm and the cavosurface angle was 90°, 110°, 135° or 160°. The investigation included the following adhesives: Clearfil, Creation 1150, GLUMA, NPG‐GMA + PMDM, Palfique, Panavia, Scotehbond and Superbond. Silux Enamel Bond was used as control. The most effective adhesive was GLUMA followed by Superbond and then NPG‐GMA + PMDM; Palfique, Panavia and Scotehbond were all less effective than NPG‐GMA + PMDM, and both Clearfil and Creation 1150 were inferior to the control, Silux Enamel Bond. None of the adhesives were able to prevent the formation of marginal gaps when measured 10 min after polymerization. After water absorption for 1 day, only GLUMA and Superbond produced gapfree fillings. Increasing the cavosurface angle resulted in a significant improvement of the effect of all adhesives, the main reason for this being the reduced ratio volume of filling to area of cavity wall.