Premium
Patterns of movement and habitat use by tigerfish ( Hydrocynus vittatus ) in the Upper Zambezi River (Namibia)
Author(s) -
Økland F.,
Thorstad E. B.,
Hay C. J.,
Næsje T. F.,
Chanda B.
Publication year - 2005
Publication title -
ecology of freshwater fish
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.667
H-Index - 55
eISSN - 1600-0633
pISSN - 0906-6691
DOI - 10.1111/j.1600-0633.2004.00080.x
Subject(s) - home range , fish <actinopterygii> , habitat , range (aeronautics) , floodplain , vegetation (pathology) , geography , ecology , movement (music) , fishery , hydrology (agriculture) , physical geography , environmental science , biology , geology , medicine , philosophy , materials science , geotechnical engineering , pathology , composite material , aesthetics
– During 6 November to 24 December 2000, 23 tigerfish [( Hydrocynus vittatus ), 30–54 cm] were tagged with radio transmitters in the Zambezi River (Namibia) to record habitat utilisation during low, rising and high water levels. The fish were tracked, on average, every fourth day during 23 November to 18 May. Two movement patterns were detected. Approximately 50% of the fish moved <1000 m among tracking surveys, staying within ‘defined’ home ranges. The remaining fish showed consistent site fidelity for periods, with long distance movements (>1000 m) to new areas among residency periods. Overall, mean distance moved between tracking surveys was 1447 m. Home range size varied among individuals, with a 95% probability of localisation within an average area of 276,978 m 2 . The fish utilised a mean river stretch of 18,836 m (range = 90–71,840). All the fish were recorded in the main stem, and on average, 95% of the fixes were in the main stem during low water. However, the fish used temporary flooded areas to an increasing extent during the rising and high water period, but did not undertake long‐distance migrations into the floodplains. Fish were sometimes near vegetation, but were never recorded into or under vegetation.