Premium
Immunophenotyping of the human bulge region: the quest to define useful in situ markers for human epithelial hair follicle stem cells and their niche
Author(s) -
Kloepper Jennifer Elisabeth,
Tiede Stephan,
Brinckmann Jürgen,
Reinhardt Dieter Peter,
Meyer Wilfried,
Faessler Reinhard,
Paus Ralf
Publication year - 2008
Publication title -
experimental dermatology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.108
H-Index - 96
eISSN - 1600-0625
pISSN - 0906-6705
DOI - 10.1111/j.1600-0625.2008.00720.x
Subject(s) - biology , hair follicle , stem cell , cytokeratin , immunophenotyping , stem cell marker , pathology , human skin , keratin , microbiology and biotechnology , outer root sheath , immunostaining , immunology , immunohistochemistry , antigen , medicine , genetics
Since the discovery of epithelial hair follicle stem cells (eHFSCs) in the bulge of human hair follicles (HFs) an important quest has started: to define useful markers. In the current study, we contribute to this by critically evaluating corresponding published immunoreactivity (IR) patterns, and by attempting to identify markers for the in situ identification of human eHFSCs and their niche. For this, human scalp skin cryosections of at least five different individuals were examined, employing standard immunohistology as well as increased sensitivity methods. Defined reference areas were compared by quantitative immunohistochemistry for the relative intensity of their specific IR. According to our experience, the most useful positive markers for human bulge cells turned out to be cytokeratin 15, cytokeratin 19 and CD200, but were not exclusive, while β1 integrin and Lhx2 IR were not upregulated by human bulge keratinocytes. Absent IR for CD34, connexin43 and nestin on human bulge cells may be exploited as negative markers. α6 integrin, fibronectin, nidogen, fibrillin‐1 and latent transforming growth factor (TGF)‐beta‐binding protein‐1 were expressed throughout the connective tissue sheath of human HFs. On the other hand, tenascin‐C was upregulated in the bulge and may thus constitute a component of the bulge stem cell niche of human HFs. These immunophenotyping results shed further light on the in situ expression patterns of claimed follicular ‘stem cell markers’ and suggest that not a single marker alone but only the use of a limited corresponding panel of positive and negative markers may offer a reasonable and pragmatic compromise for identifying human bulge stem cells in situ .