Premium
Efficacy and safety of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin in primary cutaneous B‐cell lymphomas and comparison with the commonly used therapies
Author(s) -
Pulini Stefano,
Rupoli Serena,
Goteri Gaia,
Pimpinelli Nicola,
Alterini Renato,
Bettacchi Alberta,
Mulattieri Simonetta,
Picardi Paola,
Tassetti Angela,
Scortechini Anna Rita,
Fioritoni Giuseppe,
Leoni Pietro
Publication year - 2009
Publication title -
european journal of haematology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.904
H-Index - 84
eISSN - 1600-0609
pISSN - 0902-4441
DOI - 10.1111/j.1600-0609.2008.01197.x
Subject(s) - medicine , neutropenia , toxicity , chemotherapy , refractory (planetary science) , lymphoma , doxorubicin , clinical trial , gastroenterology , surgery , pharmacology , oncology , astrobiology , physics
Objectives: The therapy of advanced, relapsed or refractory primary cutaneous lymphomas is often unsatisfactory. Recent data indicate a favourable pharmacokynetic, pharmacodynamic and toxicity profile of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (Peg‐Doxo) in primary cutaneous T‐cell lymphomas, while in primary cutaneous B‐cell lymphomas (PCBCLs), the drug efficacy has never been assessed so far. Methods: We performed a prospective phase II pilot clinical trial of Peg‐Doxo monotherapy (20 mg/m 2 ) in PCBCLs. One patient had a marginal zone B‐cell lymphoma and four were affected by diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma‐leg type, all with widespread nodular lesions. Results: All the patients achieved a complete response (CR = 100%) in a short period of time (median 3 months), even when pretreated with radio‐chemotherapy. Two experienced a relapse. At follow‐up, one patient died for progressive disease; four are in CR after 5, 52, 63 and 69 months. As concerning the toxicity profile, the treatment was well‐tolerated, no one decreased or delayed the dose. The haematological toxicity was mild with only one case of grade III neutropenia; a patient showed a grade I neurotoxicity. Dermatological toxicity, in particular the palmar–plantar erythrodysesthesia, did not occurred, probably because of both the low dosages of Peg‐Doxo monotherapy and the oral prophylaxis with pyridoxine. Conclusions: In spite of the small number of patients, it emerges that monochemotherapy with Peg‐Doxo has a significantly high clinical activity and a good safety profile in PCBCLs, even in aggressive forms, compared with other therapeutic regimens, which are completely reviewed. It suggests the need of further investigations in this field.