Premium
Interpretation of measured red cell mass and plasma volume in males with elevated venous PCV values
Author(s) -
Pearson T. C.,
Botterill C. A.,
Glass U. H.,
WetherleyMein G.
Publication year - 1984
Publication title -
scandinavian journal of haematology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.904
H-Index - 84
eISSN - 1600-0609
pISSN - 0036-553X
DOI - 10.1111/j.1600-0609.1984.tb02212.x
Subject(s) - polycythaemia , plasma volume , medicine , red cell , incidence (geometry) , physiology , gastroenterology , mathematics , geometry
A method of interpretation of red cell mass (RCM) and plasma volume (PV) data is described. The results in 188 males with PCV's over 0.50 places the patients in 4 groups: true (absolute) polycythaemias, relative (low plasma volume) polycythaemias, high normal red cell mass (HNRCM) and ‘physiological variant’. Absolute polycythaemias were increasingly frequent at higher PCV levels but only reached 100% at a PCV of 0.60. They showed an 18% incidence in the lower PCV range of 0.500‐0.519. Relative (low PV) polycythaemia was found in 18% of the patients with PCV values in the range 0.500 to 0.599. Although the HNRCM and ‘physiological variant’ types found mainly in the lower PCV ranges they occurred at the 0.54 level. While this method of interpretation of RCM and PV data is perhaps arbitrary, it does provide a basis for the proper study of the common group of patients with raised PCV levels in which classification, course and treatment are uncertain. In addition the findings suggest that both RCM and PV should be measured at all levels of PCV over 0.50; that relative (low PV) polycythaemia is a real entity but less common than sometimes believed; that diuretics do not have a notable part in its causation and that the commom HNRCM, ‘physiological variant’ groups are incompletely understood and require further study.