z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Contrasting effects of habitat area and connectivity on evenness of pollinator communities
Author(s) -
Marini Lorenzo,
Öckinger Erik,
Bergman KarlOlof,
Jauker Birgit,
Krauss Jochen,
Kuussaari Mikko,
Pöyry Juha,
Smith Henrik G.,
SteffanDewenter Ingolf,
Bommarco Riccardo
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
ecography
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.973
H-Index - 128
eISSN - 1600-0587
pISSN - 0906-7590
DOI - 10.1111/j.1600-0587.2013.00369.x
Subject(s) - species evenness , species richness , generalist and specialist species , ecology , habitat , dominance (genetics) , habitat fragmentation , pollinator , biological dispersal , biology , butterfly , fragmentation (computing) , pollination , population , biochemistry , demography , sociology , gene , pollen
Losses of both habitat area and connectivity have been identified as important drivers of species richness declines, but little theoretical and empirical work exists that addresses the effect of fragmentation on relative commonness of highly mobile species such as pollinating insects. With a large dataset of wild bee and butterfly abundances collected across Europe, we first tested the effect of habitat area and connectivity on evenness in pollinator communities using a large array of indexes that give different weight to dominance and rarity. Second, we tested if traits related to mobility and diet breadth could explain the observed evenness patterns. We found a clear negative effect of area and a weaker, but positive effect of connectivity on evenness. Communities in small habitat fragments were mainly composed of mobile and generalist species. The higher evenness in small fragments could thereby be generated by highly mobile species that maintain local populations with frequent inter‐fragment movements. Trait analysis suggested an increasing importance of dispersal over local recruitment, as we move from large to small fragments and from less to more connected fragments. Species richness and evenness were negatively correlated indicating that the two variables responded differently to habitat area and connectivity, although the mechanisms underlying the observed patterns are difficult to isolate. Even though habitat area and connectivity often decrease simultaneously due to habitat fragmentation, an interesting practical implication of the contrasting effect of the two variables is that the resulting community composition will depend on the relative strength of these two processes.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here