Open AccessAboveground dry‐matter allocation in ungrazed and grazed stands of Indigofera spinosa in the arid zone of Turkana, Kenya
Author(s) -
Oba Gufu,
Mengistu Zelalem,
Stenseth Nils C.
Publication year - 2000
Publication title -
ecography
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.973
H-Index - 128
eISSN - 1600-0587
pISSN - 0906-7590
DOI - 10.1111/j.1600-0587.2000.tb00278.x
Subject(s) - shrub , grazing , dry matter , standing crop , biomass (ecology) , biology , arid , agronomy , litter , ecology
The dwarf shrub Indigofera spinosa , indigenous to arid and semi‐arid rangelands of northeastern Africa, is an important food source for livestock. Proper management of the shrub requires improved understanding of the effects of grazing and climatic variability on aboveground dry‐matter allocation. Between 1986 and 1990, we compared the temporal variability of aboveground dry‐matter allocation to different plant biomass compartments. We also compared dry‐matter transfers between components; total live biomass to litter, standing dead to litter and live biomass to standing dead between continuously grazed and an ungrazed treatments. Partitioning of combined total dry‐matter production among different structural organs (called allocation ratio) is influenced by phenological changes, episodic rainfall and her‐bivory. Dry‐matter production in the grazed treatment responded more markedly to episodic rainfall events more than in the ungrazed treatment. Exclusion of grazers failed to improve the relative growth rate (RGR) of shrub biomass, while grazing improved it. RGR declined in the ungrazed treatment following the accumulation of standing dead dry‐matter, while m the grazed treatment it declined following the shedding of leaves. The shrub allocated more to total live biomass than to standing dead. Greater reduction of total live allocation ratio in the grazed than in the ungrazed treatment occurred during a dry year. The ungrazed treatment had higher standing dead allocation ratio than did the grazed treatment. Plants transferred more dry‐matter from total live biomass compartment to litter, than from standing dead to or from total live biomass to standing dead independent of treatment. The rates of transfer were higher in the ungrazed than in the grazed treatment. The results suggest that I spinosa has evolved to respond to climatic variability and grazmgbyallocating dry allocating dry‐matter differently between various compartments.