
Species‐range size distributions in Britain
Author(s) -
Gaston Kevin J.,
Quinn Rachel M.,
Blackburn Tim M.,
Eversham Brian C.
Publication year - 1998
Publication title -
ecography
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.973
H-Index - 128
eISSN - 1600-0587
pISSN - 0906-7590
DOI - 10.1111/j.1600-0587.1998.tb00401.x
Subject(s) - range (aeronautics) , ecology , biology , taxon , taxonomic rank , materials science , composite material
The detailed forms of species‐range size distributions in Britain are determined and contrasted for ten taxonomic assemblages (liverworts, vascular plants, molluscs [aquatic and terrestrial], dragonflies, macro‐moths. butterflies, birds [breeding and wintering], mammals). All are strongly right‐skewed when range sizes are untransformed. A logarithmic transformation fails to normalise the distribution for all but one group, and the distributions for several groups are not readily normalised at all. Taxa with larger median range sizes have species‐range size distributions that are less strongly right‐skewed. The median observed range sizes of species in each of the taxonomic groups fall, in terms of decreasing range size, in the sequence wintering birds < breeding birds < mammals < butterflies < terrestrial molluscs < dragonflies < aquatic molluscs < vascular plants < moths < liverworts. Despite the difficulties in deriving a simple and sensible mechanistic model for range size distributions, this is likely to be the most important next step towards understanding their forms.