z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Genetic structure in the species‐pair Silene vulgaris and S. uniflora (Caryophyllaceae) on the Baltic island of Öland
Author(s) -
Runyeon Helena,
Prentice Honor C.
Publication year - 1996
Publication title -
ecography
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.973
H-Index - 128
eISSN - 1600-0587
pISSN - 0906-7590
DOI - 10.1111/j.1600-0587.1996.tb00167.x
Subject(s) - biology , gene flow , silene , genetic structure , ecology , quercus petraea , interspecific competition , population , genetic diversity , sympatry , biological dispersal , rare species , habitat , botany , genetic variation , biochemistry , demography , sociology , gene
Allozyme data were used to assess the genetic structure between 37 sympatric populations of the species‐pair Silene vulgaris and S. uniflora ssp. petraea , and to infer levels of intra— and interspecific gene flow in the two species. Silene vulgaris is a geographically widespread weed of disturbed habitats whereas S. uniflora ssp. petraea is endemic to the Baltic islands of Öland and Gotland. On Öland, Silene vulgaris forms extensive linear populations along roads while S. uniflora ssp. petraea occurs in sparse and spatially‐separated populations in open limestone habitats. Despite the differences in population size and structure between the two species, both species show extremely low levels of between‐population differentiation. Between‐site differences account for <2% of the total allozyme diversity within Öland in S. vulgaris , and <1% in S. uniflora ssp. petraea. Indirect estimates of gene flow are high for both species (Nm = 11 and 27, respectively). There is no relationship between genetic distance and geographic distance within either species, and the lack of genetic structure is consistent with the pollination biology of the species — both of which are predominantly moth‐pollinated. The two species hybridize in intermediate habitats, and the geographic distribution of species‐characteristic alleles indicates a potential for spatially extensive interspecific gene flow. Nevertheless, there are significant differences in allele frequencies between the two species and multivariate analyses show no overlap between populations of the two species. The species are ecologically separated by their different habitat preferences and by differences in their flowering phenology. There is no evidence that the endemic S. uniflora ssp. petraea is threatened by genetic contamination or assimilation by the widespread weed, S. vulgaris.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here