Premium
Revolution in the provision of dental services in the UK
Author(s) -
Tickle Martin
Publication year - 2012
Publication title -
community dentistry and oral epidemiology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.061
H-Index - 101
eISSN - 1600-0528
pISSN - 0301-5661
DOI - 10.1111/j.1600-0528.2012.00729.x
Subject(s) - medicine , capitation , workforce , politics , service (business) , payment , public relations , finance , marketing , business , economic growth , economics , law , political science
The National Health Service ( NHS ) in England provides a comprehensive dental service funded largely from taxation but supplemented by co‐payments. Objectives This paper provides a historical overview of NHS dental services and some personal reflections on the main challenges over the next five years. Methods A narrative review of the literature and some subjective observations and comments. Results In 2006 there was a radical change to NHS dental sservices in England; central budgets were capped and general dental practitioners. Dentists who were previously paid on a fee‐for‐item basis moved to a new contract that required them to hit activity targets to maintain their historical income. This contract was unpopular with dentists and has been criticized for not improving access or quality. A new dental contract has been promised based on capitation. Against this background significant issues have to be addressed including: a rapidly growing gap in between demand and resources and a need to make substantial cost savings across the whole of the NHS; a significant decline in dental need; inequalities in utilisation of dental services; and provision of treatments of doubtful effectiveness. Conclusion The NHS dental healthcare system faces significant challenges and consideration needs to be given to the consequences of a focus on need rather than demand. Logically this would require a needs‐based resource allocation formula and a needs‐based approach to service and workforce planning. A move to a needs‐led service is a political decision with associated political risks.