Premium
An analysis examining socio‐economic variations in the provision of NHS general dental practitioner care under a fee for service contract among adolescents: Northern Ireland Longitudinal Study
Author(s) -
Telford Claire,
Murray Liam,
Donaldson Michael,
O’Neill Ciaran
Publication year - 2012
Publication title -
community dentistry and oral epidemiology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.061
H-Index - 101
eISSN - 1600-0528
pISSN - 0301-5661
DOI - 10.1111/j.1600-0528.2011.00649.x
Subject(s) - medicine , reimbursement , longitudinal study , census , socioeconomic status , population , dental care , multivariate analysis , service (business) , educational attainment , consumption (sociology) , demography , family medicine , socioeconomics , health care , environmental health , economic growth , sociology , social science , business , economics , pathology , marketing
Telford C, Murray L, Donaldson M, O’Neill C. An analysis examining socio‐economic variations in the provision of NHS general dental practitioner care under a fee for service contract among adolescents: Northern Ireland Longitudinal Study. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2012; 40: 70–79. © 2011 John Wiley & Sons A/S Abstract – Objectives: To examine socio‐economic variations in the use of publicly funded general dental practitioner care by adolescents under a fee for service arrangement. Method: Publicly funded general practitioner reimbursement data were linked to census and vital statistics data within the Northern Ireland Longitudinal Study. Data relate to 12 846 adolescents aged 11 or 12 in April 2003 included within the Northern Ireland Longitudinal Study (28% of the population). The main outcome measure was consumption of dental care between 2003/2004 and 2007/2008 by socio‐economic status (as measured by National Statistics Socio‐economic Classification of occupation and highest educational attainment of household reference person). Results: In multivariate analysis, socio‐economic status was a significant determinant of dental care consumed. Those of the lowest socio‐economic status, according to both occupation and highest educational attainment of household reference person, were less likely to have consumed orthodontics OR 0.76 (0.62, 0.95) and OR 0.79 (0.69, 0.91), respectively. Those of lower socio‐economic status were, however, more likely to have undergone an extraction and restorative treatment and also consumed on average more treatment than those of higher socio‐economic status. Conclusion: A demand‐led service, in which practitioners are reimbursed in part on a fee for service basis, may create incentives that contribute to different patterns of utilization between social groups. Such a system may not be providing equal access for equal need and may widen existing socio‐economic disparities in oral health among adolescents.