Premium
Study design to reduce biases in estimating the percentage of carious lesions that do not progress within a time period
Author(s) -
Shwartz Michael,
Pliskin Joseph S.,
Gröndahl HansGöran,
Boffa Joseph
Publication year - 1984
Publication title -
community dentistry and oral epidemiology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.061
H-Index - 101
eISSN - 1600-0528
pISSN - 0301-5661
DOI - 10.1111/j.1600-0528.1984.tb01422.x
Subject(s) - medicine , dentistry , protocol (science) , oral examination , pathology , oral health , alternative medicine
Abstract Much of the available information on the rate of caries progression comes from studies in which two examinations have been done and the percentage of lesions that do not progress from a carious state between the examinations recorded. Extrapolation from this type of study is subject to two offsetting biases. On the one hand, slow progressing lesions that have been in a state for a long time before the first examination may progress between examinations. When these are counted as lesions that progress within the time period between the two examinations, there will be an underestimation of non‐progressing lesions. On the other hand, slow progressing lessions will be over‐represented in the sample of lesions detected at the first examination. This will result in an overestimation of non‐progressing lesions. We suggest a three examination protocol to minimize these biases.