Premium
Periodontal disease progression and glycaemic control among Gullah African Americans with type‐2 diabetes
Author(s) -
Bandyopadhyay Dipankar,
Marlow Nicole M.,
Fernandes Jyotika K.,
Leite Renata S.
Publication year - 2010
Publication title -
journal of clinical periodontology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 3.456
H-Index - 151
eISSN - 1600-051X
pISSN - 0303-6979
DOI - 10.1111/j.1600-051x.2010.01564.x
Subject(s) - periodontal disease , medicine , diabetes mellitus , disease , type 2 diabetes , gerontology , dentistry , endocrinology
Bandyopadhyay D, Marlow NM, Fernandes JK, Leite RS: Periodontal disease progression and glycaemic control among Gullah African Americans with type‐2 diabetes. J Clin Periodontol 2010; 37: 501–509. doi: 10.1111/j.1600‐051X.2010.01564.x. Abstract Aim: To evaluate associations between glycaemic control and periodontitis progression among Gullah African Americans with type‐2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Materials and Methods: From an ongoing clinical trial among T2DM Gullah, we extracted a cohort previously in a cross‐sectional study ( N =88). Time from baseline (previous study) to follow‐up (trial enrollment, before treatment interventions) ranged 1.93–4.08 years [mean=2.99, standard deviation (SD)=0.36]. We evaluated tooth site‐level periodontitis progression [clinical attachment loss (CAL) worsening of 2 mm, periodontal probing depth (PPD) increases of 2 mm and bleeding on probing (BOP) from none to present] by glycaemic control status (well‐controlled=HbA 1c <7%, poorly‐controlled=HbA 1c 7%) using multivariable generalized estimating equations logistic regression, nesting tooth sites/person. Results: Poorly‐controlled T2DM (68.18%) was more prevalent than well‐controlled T2DM (31.82%). Proportions of tooth sites/person with CAL progression between baseline and follow‐up ranged 0.00–0.59 (mean=0.12, SD=0.12), while PPD and BOP progression ranged 0.00–0.44 (mean=0.09, SD=0.11) and 0.00–0.96 (mean=0.24, SD=0.18), respectively. Site‐level PPD at baseline was a significant effect modifier of associations between poorly‐controlled T2DM and site‐level CAL and PPD progression [adjusted odds ratios (OR) according to poorly‐controlled T2DM among PPD at baseline=3, 5 and 7 mm, respectively: CAL progression=1.93, 2.64, and 3.62, PPD progression=1.98, 2.76, and 3.84; p <0.05 for all]. Odds of site‐level BOP progression were increased (OR=1.24) for poorly‐controlled T2DM, yet the results were not significant ( p =0.32). Conclusions: These findings from a distinct, homogenous population further support the clinical relevance of identifying patients with poor glycaemic control and periodontitis, particularly among those with disparities for both diseases.