z-logo
Premium
Healing of intrabony peri‐implantitis defects following application of a nanocrystalline hydroxyapatite (Ostim ™ ) or a bovine‐derived xenograft (Bio‐Oss ™ ) in combination with a collagen membrane (Bio‐Gide ™ ). A case series
Author(s) -
Schwarz F.,
Bieling K.,
Latz T.,
Nuesry E.,
Becker J.
Publication year - 2006
Publication title -
journal of clinical periodontology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 3.456
H-Index - 151
eISSN - 1600-051X
pISSN - 0303-6979
DOI - 10.1111/j.1600-051x.2006.00936.x
Subject(s) - peri implantitis , dentistry , medicine , chemistry , implant , surgery
Objectives: The aim of the present case series was to evaluate the healing of intrabony peri‐implantitis defects following application of a nanocrystalline hydroxyapatite (NHA) or a bovine‐derived xenograft in combination with a collagen membrane (BDX+BG). Material and Methods: Twenty‐two patients having moderate peri‐implantitis ( n =22 intrabony defects) were randomly treated with (i) access flap surgery (AFS) and the application of NHA, or with AFS and the application of BDX+BG. Clinical parameters were recorded at baseline and after 6 months of non‐submerged healing. Results: Post‐operative wound healing revealed that NHA compromized initial adhesion of the mucoperiosteal flaps in all patients. At 6 months after therapy, NHA showed a reduction in the mean PD from 7.0 ± 0.6 to 4.9 ± 0.6 mm and a change in the mean clinical attachment loss (CAL) from 7.5 ± 0.8 to 5.7 ± 1.0 mm. In the BDX+BC group, the mean PD was reduced from 7.1 ± 0.8 to 4.5 ± 0.7 mm and the mean CAL changed from 7.5 ± 1.0 to 5.2 ± 0.8 mm. Conclusion: Within the limits of the present case series, it can be concluded that at 6 months after surgery both therapies resulted in clinically important PD reductions and CAL gains.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here