z-logo
Premium
Prognostic factors for alveolar regeneration: effect of tissue occlusion on alveolar bone regeneration with guided tissue regeneration
Author(s) -
Polimeni Giuseppe,
Koo KiTae,
Qahash Mohammed,
Xiropaidis Andreas V.,
Albandar Jasim M.,
Wikesjö Ulf M. E.
Publication year - 2004
Publication title -
journal of clinical periodontology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 3.456
H-Index - 151
eISSN - 1600-051X
pISSN - 0303-6979
DOI - 10.1111/j.1600-051x.2004.00543.x
Subject(s) - regeneration (biology) , dental alveolus , medicine , dentistry , occlusion , beagle , surgery , biology , microbiology and biotechnology
Objectives: Design criteria for guided tissue regeneration (GTR) devices include biocompatibility, cell occlusion, space‐provision, tissue integration, and ease of use. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of cell occlusion and space‐provision on alveolar bone regeneration in conjunction with GTR. Methods: Routine, critical‐size, 6 mm, supra‐alveolar, periodontal defects were created in 6 young adult Beagle dogs. Space‐providing ePTFE devices, with or without 300‐ μ m laser‐drilled pores were implanted to provide for GTR. Treatments were alternated between left and right jaw quadrants in subsequent animals. The gingival flaps were advanced for primary intention healing. The animals were euthanized at week 8 post surgery. The histometric analysis assessed regeneration of alveolar bone relative to space‐provision by the ePTFE device. Results: A significant relationship was observed between bone regeneration and space‐provision for defect sites receiving the occlusive ( β =0.194; p <0.02) and porous ( β =0.229; p <0.0004) GTR devices irrespective of treatment ( p =0.14). The bivariate analysis showed that both space‐provision and device occlusivity significantly enhanced bone regeneration. Hence, sites receiving the occlusive GTR device and sites with enhanced space‐provision showed significantly greater bone regeneration compared to sites receiving the porous GTR device ( p =0.03) or more limited space‐provision ( p =0.0002). Conclusions: Cell occlusion and space‐provision may significantly influence the magnitude of alveolar bone regeneration in conjunction with guided tissue regeneration.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom