Premium
A comparative study on the use of a HA/collagen/chondroitin sulphate biomaterial (Biostite®) and a bovine‐derived HA xenograft (Bio‐Oss®) in the treatment of deep intra‐osseous defects
Author(s) -
Scabbia Alessandro,
Trombelli Leonardo
Publication year - 2004
Publication title -
journal of clinical periodontology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 3.456
H-Index - 151
eISSN - 1600-051X
pISSN - 0303-6979
DOI - 10.1111/j.1600-051x.2004.00483.x
Subject(s) - medicine , biomaterial , dentistry , chondroitin sulphate , surgery , reconstructive surgery , biomedical engineering , anatomy , glycosaminoglycan
Objectives: This parallel‐group, randomized, clinical trial was designed to evaluate the clinical outcome of deep intra‐osseous defects following reconstructive surgery with the use of a synthetic hydroxyapatite/equine Type I collagen/chondroitin sulphate biomaterial (Biostite®), as compared to a bovine‐derived hydroxyapatite xenograft (Bio‐Oss®). Material and methods: Twenty‐four systemically healthy subjects with moderate to advanced periodontitis, 11 females and 13 males, aged 30–64 years, seven smokers, were selected. Patients presented with one interproximal deep intra‐osseous defect (intra‐osseous component4 mm) as clinically and radiographically evaluated. Immediately before surgery and 12 months after surgery, pocket probing depth (PPD), clinical attachment level (CAL) and radiographic depth of the defect (DEPTH) were evaluated. Results: Thirteen defects were treated with Biostite® (test) and 11 defects with Bio‐Oss® (control). In the test group, PPD amounted to 7.8±1.3 mm before surgery, and decreased significantly to 3.6±1.6 mm 12 months following surgery, while in the control group PPD significantly decreased from 7.5±2.0 mm pre‐surgery to 3.1±1.0 mm post‐surgery. At 1 year, CAL gain and DEPTH gain were 2.9±1.9 and 2.5±1.4 mm, respectively, in the test group, and 4.0±2.4 mm and 3.1±1.8 mm, respectively, in the control group. No statistically significant differences for PPD reduction, CAL gain and DEPTH gain were detected between the groups. Conclusions: The results of the present study indicate that both Biostite® and Bio‐Oss® grafting biomaterials have determined a clinically and statistically significant improvement in terms of CAL gain, PPD reduction and radiographic DEPTH gain when used for the treatment of deep intra‐osseous defects.