Premium
Comparison of panoramic and intraoral radiography and pocket probing for the measurement of the marginal bone level
Author(s) -
Åkesson Louise,
Håkansson Jan,
Rohlin Madeleine
Publication year - 1992
Publication title -
journal of clinical periodontology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 3.456
H-Index - 151
eISSN - 1600-051X
pISSN - 0303-6979
DOI - 10.1111/j.1600-051x.1992.tb00654.x
Subject(s) - radiography , medicine , dentistry , orthodontics , radiology
Panoramic, bitewing and periapical radiography and probing for measurement of the marginal bone level were compared. Altogether 237 sites of 23 patients were examined. Radiographs were taken with a splint containing steel balls to allow calculation of the enlargement of the radiographs. Probing was done before and during flap surgery using the same splint. The open bone measurement represented the true value. All radiographs were assessed by 5 observers. The mean enlargement of panoramic radiography was 27% in the upper and 26% in the lower arch. For bitewing and periapical radiography, it was 8% in the upper and 4–5% in the lower arch. All methods underestimated the bone loss. Probing bone level before surgery was most accurate, deviating at most 5% from the true value. Periapical radiography was more accurate than panoramic and bitewing radiography ( p < 0.001). Panoramic radiography presented a slightly lower mean accuracy than bitewing radiography ( p <0.05). The underestimation of the bone loss ranged from 13 to 32% in orthopantomograms, 11–23% in bitewing and 9–20% in periapical radiographs. The interobserver variation of the radiographic methods was substantial.