Premium
The effect of different surface treatments on the bond strength of a gingiva‐colored indirect composite veneering material to three implant framework materials
Author(s) -
Koizuka Mai,
Komine Futoshi,
Blatz Markus B.,
Fushiki Ryosuke,
Taguchi Kohei,
Matsumura Hideo
Publication year - 2013
Publication title -
clinical oral implants research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.407
H-Index - 161
eISSN - 1600-0501
pISSN - 0905-7161
DOI - 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02505.x
Subject(s) - cubic zirconia , bond strength , materials science , composite material , composite number , titanium , ultimate tensile strength , particle (ecology) , ceramic , phosphoric acid , metallurgy , adhesive , layer (electronics) , oceanography , geology
Objectives To evaluate and compare the shear‐bond strength of a gingiva‐colored indirect composite material to three different implant framework materials (zirconia ceramics, gold alloy, and titanium), and to investigate the effect of surface pretreatment by air‐particle abrasion and four priming agents. Material and methods A gingiva‐colored indirect composite (Ceramage) was bonded to three framework materials ( n = 80): commercially pure titanium ( CP ‐ Ti ), ADA (American Dental Association)‐type 4 casting gold alloy (Type IV), and zirconia ceramics (Zirconia) with or without airborne‐particle abrasion. Before bonding, the surface of the specimens was treated using no (control) or one of four priming agents: Alloy Primer ( ALP ), Estenia Opaque Primer ( EOP ), Metal Link Primer ( MLP ), and V‐Primer ( VPR ). Shear‐bond strength was determined after 24‐h wet storage. Data were analyzed using Steel–Dwass for multiple comparisons, and Mann–Whitney U ‐test ( P = 0.05). Results For both CP ‐ Ti and Zirconia substrates, three groups, ALP , EOP , and MLP , showed significantly higher bond strengths ( P < 0.05) than the other groups with or without airborne‐particle abrasion. For Type IV substrates, significantly higher bond strengths were obtained in ALP and MLP groups ( P < 0.01) compared with the other groups with airborne‐particle abrasion. Conclusions Application of priming agents containing specific phosphoric ester groups significantly enhances the bond strength of a gingiva‐colored composite material to commercially pure titanium and zirconia frameworks. Combined use of a thione monomer with a phosphoric monomer enhances the bond strengths to airborne‐particle abraded type IV gold alloy.