z-logo
Premium
Maxillary sinus floor augmentation with injectable calcium phosphate cements: a pre‐clinical study in sheep
Author(s) -
Hoekstra Jan Willem M.,
Klijn Reinoud J.,
Meijer Gert J.,
den Beucken Jeroen J. J. P.,
Jansen John A.
Publication year - 2013
Publication title -
clinical oral implants research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.407
H-Index - 161
eISSN - 1600-0501
pISSN - 0905-7161
DOI - 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02421.x
Subject(s) - dentistry , maxillary sinus , calcium , medicine
Objectives The aim of this pre‐clinical study was to evaluate the biological performance of two injectable calcium phosphate cement ( CPC ) composite materials containing poly(D,L‐lactic‐ co ‐glycolic)acid ( PLGA ) microspheres with different properties in a maxillary sinus floor elevation model in sheep. Materials and methods PLGA microspheres were made of either low molecular weight (~17 kDa) acid‐terminated PLGA ( PLGA L‐AT ) or high molecular weight (~44 kDa) end‐capped PLGA ( PLGA H‐EC ) and incorporated in CPC . Eight female Swifter sheep underwent a bilateral maxillary sinus floor elevation procedure via an extra‐oral approach. All animals received both materials, alternately injected in the left and right sinus (split‐mouth model) and a time point of 12 weeks was used. Analysis of biological performance was based on histology, histomorphometry, and evaluation of sequential fluorochrome labeling. Results Both types of CPC ‐ PLGA composites showed biocompatibility and direct bone‐cement contact. CPC ‐ PLGA L‐AT showed a significantly higher degradation distance compared to CPC ‐ PLGA H‐EC (1949 ± 1295 μm vs. 459 ± 267 μm; P =  0.0107). Further, CPC ‐ PLGA L‐AT showed significantly more bone in the region of interest (26.4 ± 10.5% vs. 8.6 ± 3.9% for PLGA H‐EC ; P  =   0.0009) and significantly less remaining CPC material (61.2 ± 17.7% vs. 81.9 ± 10.9% for PLGA H‐EC ; P =  0.0192). Conclusions Both CPC ‐ PLGA L‐AT and CPC ‐ PLGA H‐EC demonstrated to be safe materials for sinus floor elevation procedures in a large animal model, presenting biocompatibility and direct bone contact. In view of material performance, CPC ‐ PLGA L‐AT showed significantly faster degradation and a significantly higher amount of newly formed bone compared to CPC ‐ PLGA H‐EC .

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom