Premium
Implementation of the “loaded implant” model in the rat using a miniaturized setup – description of the method and first results
Author(s) -
Wiskott H. W. Anselm,
Bonhote Philippe,
Cugi Joel,
Durual Stéphane,
Zacchetti Giovanna,
Botsis John,
Scherrer Susanne S.,
Ammann Patrick
Publication year - 2012
Publication title -
clinical oral implants research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.407
H-Index - 161
eISSN - 1600-0501
pISSN - 0905-7161
DOI - 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02349.x
Subject(s) - implant , biomedical engineering , materials science , stimulation , titanium , anabolism , dentistry , surgery , medicine , metallurgy
Objective To miniaturize the “loaded implant” model to permit its application to small rodents. In this model, two titanium implants are placed 8 mm apart with their heads protruding from the skin and are forced together by a dedicated actuator. To assess the effect of (i) the post‐implantation healing period and the duration of stimulation and (ii) the intratissular strain level on the microtomographical bone parameters BV / TV , Tb.N. , Tb.Th. and BIC . Materials and methods Implants, 1 × 8 mm, were machined, inserted into the tibiae of rats and activated. A total of 123 animals were used. In series 1, the implants were left to heal for 2/4 weeks and then loaded to generate intratissular strains of 1125 ± 5% με for 4/8 weeks. Series 2 had their implants loaded to 750, 1500 and 2250 ± 5% με, respectively. Results Bone to implant contact increased upon loading. In series 1, no difference was observed regarding the duration of healing or the stimulation period. In series 2, at 750 με, the bone parameters did not differ from baseline. At 1500 με, all four parameters increased. At 2250 με, three of four parameters decreased relative to 1500 με. Conclusions (i) The loaded implant model can be miniaturized to the millimeter range; (ii) in the present model, implant activation beyond 4 weeks did not affect the bone parameters; (iii) mechanical stimulation increased bone to implant contact by up to 20%; (iv) the results obtained are consistent with the concept of an anabolic effect from 750 to 1500 με and deleterious effects at strains in the 2250 με range; and (v) strains at 2250 με did not lead to implant dis‐integration.