Premium
Guided Bone Regeneration: biological principle and therapeutic applications
Author(s) -
Retzepi M.,
Donos N.
Publication year - 2010
Publication title -
clinical oral implants research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.407
H-Index - 161
eISSN - 1600-0501
pISSN - 0905-7161
DOI - 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.01922.x
Subject(s) - regeneration (biology) , medicine , dental alveolus , process (computing) , soft tissue , dentistry , bone healing , intensive care medicine , surgery , biology , computer science , microbiology and biotechnology , operating system
The Guided Bone Regeneration (GBR) treatment concept advocates that regeneration of osseous defects is predictably attainable via the application of occlusive membranes, which mechanically exclude non‐osteogenic cell populations from the surrounding soft tissues, thereby allowing osteogenic cell populations originating from the parent bone to inhabit the osseous wound. The present review discusses the evolution of the GBR biological rationale and therapeutic concept over the last two decades. Further, an overview of the GBR research history is provided with specific focus on the evidence available on its effectiveness and predictability in promoting the regeneration of critical size cranio‐maxillo‐facial defects, the neo‐osteogenesis potential and the reconstruction of atrophic alveolar ridges before, or in conjunction with, the placement of dental implants. The authors conclude that future research should focus on (a) the investigation of the molecular mechanisms underlying the wound healing process following GBR application; (b) the identification of site and patient related factors which impact on the effectiveness and predictability of GBR therapy and (c) the evaluation of the pathophysiology of the GBR healing process in the presence of systemic conditions potentially affecting the skeletal system. To cite this article:
Retzepi M, Donos N. Guided Bone Regeneration: biological principle and therapeutic applications.
Clin. Oral Impl. Res . 21 , 2010; 567–576.
doi: 10.1111/j.1600‐0501.2010.01922.x