Premium
Soft tissue around three different implant types after 1.5 years of functional loading without oral hygiene
Author(s) -
Watzak Georg,
Zechner Werner,
Tangl Stefan,
Vasak Christoph,
Donath Karl,
Watzek Georg
Publication year - 2006
Publication title -
clinical oral implants research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.407
H-Index - 161
eISSN - 1600-0501
pISSN - 0905-7161
DOI - 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01217.x
Subject(s) - implant , dentistry , mucositis , maxilla , junctional epithelium , medicine , soft tissue , mandible (arthropod mouthpart) , osseointegration , periodontium , oral hygiene , connective tissue , surgery , biology , radiation therapy , botany , pathology , genus
The purpose of this study was to determine the peri‐implant soft tissue dimension (PSD) and peri‐implant bone level (BL) of dental implants with different designs and surface modifications after functional loading without oral hygiene. Three types of dental implants were placed in the posterior jaws of adult baboons, three of the same design per quadrant, and fitted with fixed partial dentures. After 1.5 years of functional loading and plaque accumulation, all implants showed severe peri‐implant mucositis and comparatively high BL. A histomorphometric evaluation of the sulcus depth (SD), the dimension of the junctional epithelium (JE) and the connective tissue contact (CTC) resulted in no significant differences between the three implant designs, neither in the maxilla nor in the mandible ( P >0.05). The sum of SD, JE and CTC forming the PSD was nearly the same in the maxilla (commercially pure titanium, CpTi: 3.5 mm 2.9/4.1 confidence interval (CI); titanium plasma sprayed (TPS): 3.5 mm 2.9/4.2 CI; sand blasted acid‐etched (GBAE): 3.2 mm 2.7/3.9 CI) and in the mandible (CpTi: 3.2 mm 2.6/3.8 CI; TPS: 3.2 mm 2.6/3.8 CI; GBAE: 3.2 mm 2.7/3.9 CI; P >0.05). There was no difference in BL around the three implant designs (maxilla: CpTi: 0.9 mm 0.5/1.6 CI; TPS: 0.9 mm 0.5/1.5CI; GBAE: 0.9 mm 0.5/1.6 CI; mandible: CpTi: 0.8 mm 0.5/1.2 CI; TPS: 0.6 mm 0.4/0.9 CI; GBAE: 0.7 mm 0.5/1.1 CI; P >0.05). Overall, the data presented did not show any significant differences in peri‐implant soft tissue conditions in baboons. Moreover, plaque accumulation and propagation of peri‐implant mucositis after 1.5 years of functional loading was not influenced by implant design and surface modifications in baboons.