Premium
Histomorphometrie und Mikro‐Computertomographie bei der Knochenaugmentation unter Titianmembranen
Author(s) -
Maréchal Marina,
Luyten Frank,
Nijs Jos,
Postnov Andrei,
Schepers Evert,
Steenberghe Daniël
Publication year - 2005
Publication title -
clinical oral implants research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.407
H-Index - 161
eISSN - 1600-0501
pISSN - 0905-7161
DOI - 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01205.x
Subject(s) - titanium , biomedical engineering , tomography , materials science , x ray microtomography , volume (thermodynamics) , anatomy , nuclear medicine , medicine , radiology , physics , quantum mechanics , metallurgy
Objectives: Bone augmentation underneath an occlusive titanium membrane is evaluated in most cases by means of serial histological sections and histomorphometry. Micro‐computed tomography (micro‐CT) is a less invasive and dynamic technique to measure bone volume in animals of a size that fits into the gantry. The aim of the present study was to evaluate whether the latter approach could match histomorphometry to assess bone augmentation under a titanium membrane. Material and methods: Pre‐formed titanium cups were placed on the skull of 16 rabbits. Bone formation underneath the cups was allowed to occur for 12 weeks. The amount of bone volume assessed by micro‐CT was expressed as a numerical unit. One unit volume corresponds to 0.043 mm 3 . The measurements reveal the volume of bone‐like tissue under the membrane, with the same density as that of the original rabbit skull bone. Histological sections were cut along the same plane as the one used for the micro‐CT images. The total bone surface was assessed by a digital image system in double‐stained undecalcified histological sections and related to the maximum available surface of the titanium cups, which was on average 1366 mm 2 . Results: The amount of total bone surface found under the titanium membrane varied between 40 and 163 mm 2 . Measured by micro‐CT, the bone detected ranged from 3.7 to 396 numerical units. A highly significant ( P <0.001) correlation was found between the total bone volume measured in conventional serial histological sections and by the micro‐CT technique ( r 2 =0.72). Conclusions: The total bone volume measured underneath a membrane using the micro‐CT when compared with histological sections remained within a 16% error. This is because of the scattering effect of the metallic membrane and the impossibility to distinguish newly formed bone from the original skull bone on the micro‐CT images.