Premium
Teaching DSM‐III to clinicians: Some problems of the DSM‐III system reducing reliability, using the diagnosis and classification of depressive disorders as an example
Author(s) -
Malt Ulrik Fr.
Publication year - 1986
Publication title -
acta psychiatrica scandinavica
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.849
H-Index - 146
eISSN - 1600-0447
pISSN - 0001-690X
DOI - 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1986.tb10527.x
Subject(s) - medical diagnosis , reliability (semiconductor) , dsm 5 , psychology , norwegian , clinical psychology , psychiatry , medicine , power (physics) , linguistics , physics , philosophy , pathology , quantum mechanics
Experiences from teaching DSM‐III to more than three hundred Norwegian psychiatrists and clinical psychologists suggest that reliable DSM‐III diagnoses can be achieved within a few hours training with reference to the decision trees and the diagnostic criteria only. The diagnoses provided are more reliable than the corresponding ICD diagnoses which the participants were more familiar with. The three main sources of reduced reliability of the DSM‐III diagnoses are related to: (1) poor knowledge of the criteria which often is connected with failure of obtaining diagnostic key information during the clincal interview; (2) unfamiliar concepts and (3) vague or ambiguous criteria. The two first issues are related to the quality of the teaching of DSM‐III. The third source of reduced reliability reflects unsolved validity issues. By using the classification of five affective case stories as examples, these sources of diagnostic pitfalls, reducing reliability and ways to overcome these problems when teaching the DSM‐III system, are discussed. It is concluded that the DSM‐III system of classification is easy to teach and that the system is superior to other classification systems available from a reliability point of view. The current version of the DSM‐III system, however, partly owes a high degree of reliability to broad and heterogenous diagnostic categories like the concept major depression, which may have questionable validity. Thus, the future revisions of the DSM‐III system should, above all, address the issue of validity.