Premium
Double‐blind therapeutic evaluation of fluspirilene compared with fluphenazine decanoate in chronic schizophrenics
Author(s) -
Frangos H.,
Zissis N. P.,
Leontopoulos I.,
Diamantas N.,
Tsitouridis S.,
Gavriil I.,
Tsolis K.
Publication year - 1978
Publication title -
acta psychiatrica scandinavica
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.849
H-Index - 146
eISSN - 1600-0447
pISSN - 0001-690X
DOI - 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1978.tb06912.x
Subject(s) - fluphenazine , antipsychotic , extrapyramidal symptoms , schizophrenia (object oriented programming) , akathisia , psychology , parkinsonism , medicine , anesthesia , psychiatry , haloperidol , dopamine , disease
Fifty chronic schizophrenics were randomly assigned to a 16‐week treatment either with fluspirilene or with fluphenazine decanoate. The aim of the study was to compare the antipsychotic action and the side effects of the two neuroleptics. Fluphenazine decanoate caused more side effects and the difference between the two groups was statistically significant in the items tremor, severe extrapyramidal effects and parkinsonism. More patients in the fluspirilene group (nine patients) compared with only three in the fluphenazine decanoate group remained free of side effects during the whole trial. Judged from the BPRS fluspirilene proved an equally potent neuroleptic with fluphenazine decanoate although statistically significant improvement has been obtained in more items of the scale in the fluspirilene group. The improvement in the NOSIE‐30 was much more clear in the fluspirilene group. Although Clinical Global Impressions of the investigators and the nursing personnel favored fluspirilene, the differences between the two groups were not statistically significant.