Open AccessVacuum extraction: development and test of a procedure‐specific rating scale
Author(s) -
MAAGAARD MATHILDE,
OESTERGAARD JEANETT,
JOHANSEN MARIANNE,
ANDERSEN LISE LOTTE,
RINGSTED CHARLOTTE,
OTTESEN BENT,
SØRENSEN JETTE L.
Publication year - 2012
Publication title -
acta obstetricia et gynecologica scandinavica
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.401
H-Index - 102
eISSN - 1600-0412
pISSN - 0001-6349
DOI - 10.1111/j.1600-0412.2012.01526.x
Subject(s) - cronbach's alpha , medicine , checklist , delphi method , scale (ratio) , delphi , intraclass correlation , construct validity , content validity , psychometrics , clinical psychology , psychology , artificial intelligence , computer science , cartography , cognitive psychology , operating system , geography
Objectives . To develop and validate an Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills (OSATS) scale for vacuum extraction. Design . Two‐part study design: Primarily, development of a procedure‐specific checklist for vacuum extraction. Hereafter, validation of the developed OSATS scale for vacuum extraction in a prospective observational study. Setting . Rigshospitalet, University Hospital of Copenhagen. Population . For development, an obstetric expert from each labor ward in Denmark (28 departments) was invited to participate. For validation, nine first‐year residents and 10 chief physicians with daily work in the obstetric field were tested. Methods . The Delphi method was used for development of the scale. In a simulated vacuum extraction scenario, first‐year residents and obstetric chief physicians were rated using the developed OSATS scale for vacuum extraction to test construct validity of the scale. Main outcome measures . Consensus for the content of the scale. To test the scale of Cronbach's alpha, interclass correlation and differential item function was calculated in the prospective study. Results . 89% completed the first and 61% completed the second Delphi round. Hereafter, consensus was obtained. There was a significant difference between residents’ and experts’ performance for total score and for the score of the separate parts of the scale. Cronbach's alpha for total score and for the separate parts of the scale was 0.91–0.95 and interclass correlation 0.84–0.9. Conclusions . The OSATS scale for vacuum extraction is a reliable test for differentiating between competence levels in a simulated setting.