Attendance at post‐abortal follow‐up visits is low – can the risks of non‐attendance be identified?
Author(s) -
POHJORANTA ELINA,
SUHONEN SATU,
HEIKINHEIMO OSKARI
Publication year - 2011
Publication title -
acta obstetricia et gynecologica scandinavica
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.401
H-Index - 102
eISSN - 1600-0412
pISSN - 0001-6349
DOI - 10.1111/j.1600-0412.2011.01099.x
Subject(s) - medicine , attendance , abortion , obstetrics , retrospective cohort study , young adult , pregnancy , gynecology , genetics , economics , biology , economic growth
Post‐abortal follow‐up visits are recommended following induced abortion. To assess the rates of attendance and the factors affecting it, we performed a retrospective study of 500 women who had an induced abortion up to 20 weeks of gestation. Altogether, 285 (57%) women attended for the follow‐up visit as scheduled. In univariable analysis a history of drug abuse (OR=0.22, 95%CI 0.06–0.81, p =0.02) was associated with non‐attendance. Women who underwent medical abortion either at the hospital (OR=3.93, 95%CI 2.61–5.92, p <0.01) or partly at home (OR=3.30, 95%CI 1.86–5.84, p <0.01) and those with a history of human papilloma virus manifestation (OR=2.38, 95%CI 1.04–5.26, p =0.04) were more likely to attend the follow‐up visit. The effects of medical abortion and a history of human papilloma virus manifestation persisted in multivariable analysis. We conclude that attendance at post‐abortal follow‐up visits is low, with only a few clinically significant risk factors predicting non‐attendance.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom