Premium
MRI and visual‐evoked potentials in partners of multiple sclerosis patients
Author(s) -
Hawkes C. H.,
Chawda S.,
Derakshani S.,
Muhammed N.,
Visentin E.,
Boniface D.
Publication year - 2012
Publication title -
acta neurologica scandinavica
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.967
H-Index - 95
eISSN - 1600-0404
pISSN - 0001-6314
DOI - 10.1111/j.1600-0404.2011.01586.x
Subject(s) - multiple sclerosis , subclinical infection , magnetic resonance imaging , medicine , optic nerve , audiology , epidemiology , pediatrics , psychology , psychiatry , radiology , ophthalmology
Hawkes CH, Chawda S, Derakshani S, Muhammed N, Visentin E, Boniface D. MRI and visual‐evoked potentials in partners of multiple sclerosis patients.
Acta Neurol Scand: 2012: 125: 424–430.
© 2011 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Objective – Some epidemiological evidence, particularly concerning the role of Epstein Barr Virus implies that multiple sclerosis (MS) may be transmissible and if correct, this might be revealed by increased prevalence of MS in cohabiting partners. Methods – We addressed this problem by neurological assessment, visual‐evoked potentials (VEP) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in 112 partners of patients with MS in comparison to a control group of 93 individuals with clinically non‐significant head or neck pain and in comparison to UK prevalence. Results – We found one instance of conjugal definite MS. Including this case, VEP were abnormal in five instances with either significant delay ( n = 3) or increased interocular latency difference (IOLD) ( n = 2) in partners of MS patients thus raising the possibility of subclinical optic nerve demyelination. The mean absolute value of IOLD in partners was greater than the value in controls ( P = 0.033). There were no significant differences in MRI findings between the two groups. Conclusion – The finding of one conjugal pair and abnormal VEP in a further four MS partners could have several explanations. It is compatible with the concept of a transmissible agent, although our observations could be due to several biases as well as the play of chance alone.